Re: Collapse ext2 and 3 please

From: John Richard Moser
Date: Fri Jun 25 2004 - 18:49:23 EST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Andrew Morton wrote:
| Sean Neakums <sneakums@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
|
|>I seem to remember somebody, I think maybe Andrew Morton, suggesting
|>that a no-journal mode be added to ext3 so that ext2 could be removed.
|>I can't find the message in question right now, though.
|
|
| I think it could be done, mainly as a kernel-space-saving exercise. But
| the two filesystems are quite different nowadays.
|
| ext2 uses per-inode pagecache for directories, ext3 uses blockdev
| pagecache. The truncate algorithms are significantly different. Other
stuff.
|

So why isn't it feasible to keep truncate algorithms and pagecache code
separated while collapsing the rest? Same logic as i said in another reply:

if (journaled)
~ extfs_journaled_truncate();
else
~ extfs_nonjournaled_truncate();

| Much pain, little gain.

I understand this; but all work done is volunteer, so it'll only get
done if someone wants to do it :)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFA3LnAhDd4aOud5P8RApugAJ45XGfdVGxVSEYsk/N55S4r5Qd+BACgi1vp
cgv421B9Yxc3EX/TUv/nm+M=
=bZBQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/