Re: [RFC] ethtool semantics

[Tim Hockin]

On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 03:11:15PM +0200, Marc Herbert wrote:
> > That is absolutely the correct thing to do, module parameters for
> > link settings are %100 deprecated, people need to use ethtool for
> > everything.
> 
> This is precisely the reason why I am concerned about having "rich"
> ethtool semantics. A unified, standard interface is great,... as long
> it does not leave behind some features, like setting the advertised
> values in autoneg. As a user of these features, I hope driver
> developers will NOT remove those module_param features that cannot
> migrated to ethtool.

So propose a sane semantic that handles all three cases:
* autoneg on
* autoneg off
* autoneg on but limited


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/