Re: flush cache range proposal (was Re: ide errors in 7-rc1-mm1 and later)

[Stuart Young]

On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 03:50, Jeff Garzik wrote:

> 2) IDENTIFY DEVICE, Word 207, Command set/feature enabled
>
> bit 15:		shall be cleared to zero
> bit 14:		shall be set to one
> bits 13:1:	reserved
> bits 0:		1 == flush cache (range) enabled
>
> Word 206:
>
> If bit 0 is set to one, the mandatory FLUSH CACHE and FLUSH CACHE EXT
> commands (if implemented) support the RANGE bit, and user-supplied LBA
> and sector count specifying the limits of the cache flush.

Shouldn't that be "Word 207:" up there?

-- 
 Stuart Young (aka Cef)
 cef-lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx is for LKML and related email only
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/