Re: [BUG] NFS no longer updates file modification timesappropriately

[Trond Myklebust]

På må , 07/06/2004 klokka 12:13, skreiv Joe Korty:
> > 
> > >   In which case we
> > > could defer a timestamp-on-write only when it is still in the same second
> > > as the previous write, but don't defer when a new second rolls around
> > > on the client.  That would reduce timestamp updates to at most one per
> > > second per inode per client, while preserving old NFS behavior.
> > 
> > Exactly why should we go to all this trouble?
> 
> For compatibility?

With what? There has never been a standard other than the close-to-open.

Cheers,
  Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/