Re: [PATCH] cpumask 5/10 rewrite cpumask.h - single bitmap basedimplementation

[Paul Jackson]

William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> or whatever someone can be arsed to consider a better idea.

If anyone lurking feels the urge to drive this puppy home, jump in.

I'm unavailable, and from what I can guess reading between William's
lines, he's not signed up either.  Be forewarned - it's an area that can
generate some long lkml threads ;).  Both William and I seem to have an
ample supply of keystrokes.


> a user ABI change in a stable series, would be unfriendly

I agree.  While I contemplated such, I don't recall advocating such,
for the reason you state.  We're stuck at least for now with the
sched_(set/get)affinity ABI.

-- 
                          I won't rest till it's the best ...
                          Programmer, Linux Scalability
                          Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.650.933.1373
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/