Re: idebus setup problem (2.6.7-rc1)

[Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz]

On Friday 04 of June 2004 06:32, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-06-04 at 07:44, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 of June 2004 23:31, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 10:05:08PM +0800, Zhu, Yi wrote:
> > > > Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > > > Dislike this idea.  If you have hundreds of parameters, maybe it's
> > > > > supposed to be a PITA?
> > > >
> > > > What's your idea to make module_param support alterable param
> > > > names like ide3=xxx ?
> > >
> > > hmm, what about making all those something like:
> > >
> > > 	ide=3:foo,bar;4:wossname
> >
> > We are in stable kernel and in 2.7 'idex=' and 'hdx=' will die.
>
> Yes, and if you want to clean this up for 2.6, I'd recommend simply
> putting twenty module_param_call() lines.

10 for "idex="
20 for "hdx="
 1 for "idebus="
 1 for "ide="

I tried it once and result was uglier than the current behavior
(part of the problem is that MAX_HWIFS is arch/config dependent).

Why can't we apply this minimal fix from Yi for now?

--- linux-2.6.7-rc1-mm1.orig/init/main.c        2004-05-28 12:39:15.549314064 +0800
+++ linux-2.6.7-rc1-mm1/init/main.c     2004-05-28 12:40:29.399087192 +0800
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static int __init obsolete_checksetup(ch
        p = &__setup_start;
        do {
                int n = strlen(p->str);
-               if (len <= n && !strncmp(line, p->str, n)) {
+               if (n == 0 || (len <= n && !strncmp(line, p->str, n))) {
                        /* Already done in parse_early_param? */
                        if (p->early)
                                return 1;

> It's ugly, but that's because it's doing ugly things, IMHO, and I don't
> think Bart would disagree?
>
> Rusty.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/