Re: Bad X-performance on 2.6.6 & 2.6.7-rc1 on x86-64

[Malte SchrÃder]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

| For completeness could you test the OSS emu10k driver (which supports
| PCM, while the ALSA driver does not) and see if you experience better
| overall performance?  Like less CPU utilization etc... I'm very
| interested in finding out where the bottlenecks are.  The emu10k1
| driver
| isn't perfect and neither are xine or mplayer so I'd like figure out
| what  exactly  is going on here.  I'll of course do the same.  It's just
| kind of hard to judge for me seeing as my system is now 4 years old.

I dont think it would make a difference sice cpu-time used by system is
really low since switching off mmap. But my overall experience with the
emu10k1 alsa-driver since it hit version 1.0 is quite good (before there
where some issues or should I say "annoyances" with the mixer). But if
you really want this I can rebuild my kernel and swith all that
oss-stuff back on ;)

Greets
- --
- ---------------------------------------
Malte SchrÃder
MalteSch@xxxxxx
ICQ# 68121508
- ---------------------------------------

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAta1w4q3E2oMjYtURAt+AAJ0XTwmxsRsAgASfpfeWqs+DlQqdKwCfQ2Hy
dYqPGy93HVcqjYJTFsKyayE=
=nxDc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/