Re: Distributions vs kernel development

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 17:53, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> After having being burned twice: first by Mandrake and supermount, and second
> by SuSe and reiserfs attributes; are any of the distributions committed to
> making sure that their distribution will run the standard kernel? (ie. 2.6.X from
> kernel.org).

I can say that for Fedora Core we do have this goal. Obviously we do
expect a "recent enough" kernel, eg a 2.2 kernel on FC1 probably will
give issues, as will 2.4.0. 2.4.2x ought to be fine though.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part