Re: RCU scaling on large systems

[William Lee Irwin III]

On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 07:08:05AM -0500, Jack Steiner wrote:
> On a 512p idle 2.6.5 system, each cpu spends ~6% of the time in the kernel
> RCU code. The time is spent contending for shared cache lines.

Would something like this help cacheline contention? This uses the
per_cpu data areas to hold per-cpu booleans for needing switches.
Untested/uncompiled.

The global lock is unfortunately still there.


-- wli

Index: wli-2.6.6-rc3-mm1/include/linux/rcupdate.h
===================================================================
--- wli-2.6.6-rc3-mm1.orig/include/linux/rcupdate.h	2004-04-03 19:36:52.000000000 -0800
+++ wli-2.6.6-rc3-mm1/include/linux/rcupdate.h	2004-05-01 14:15:09.000000000 -0700
@@ -41,6 +41,9 @@
 #include <linux/threads.h>
 #include <linux/percpu.h>
 #include <linux/cpumask.h>
+#include <asm/atomic.h>
+
+#define RCU_CPU_SCATTER (NR_CPUS > 128)
 
 /**
  * struct rcu_head - callback structure for use with RCU
@@ -68,8 +71,10 @@
 	spinlock_t	mutex;		/* Guard this struct                  */
 	long		curbatch;	/* Current batch number.	      */
 	long		maxbatch;	/* Max requested batch number.        */
+#if !RCU_CPU_SCATTER
 	cpumask_t	rcu_cpu_mask; 	/* CPUs that need to switch in order  */
 					/* for current batch to proceed.      */
+#endif
 };
 
 /* Is batch a before batch b ? */
@@ -96,6 +101,9 @@
         long  	       	batch;           /* Batch # for current RCU batch */
         struct list_head  nxtlist;
         struct list_head  curlist;
+#if RCU_CPU_SCATTER
+	atomic_t	need_switch;
+#endif
 };
 
 DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_data);
@@ -109,13 +117,39 @@
 
 #define RCU_QSCTR_INVALID	0
 
+#if RCU_CPU_SCATTER
+#define rcu_need_switch(cpu)		(!!atomic_read(&per_cpu(rcu_data, cpu).need_switch))
+#define rcu_clear_need_switch(cpu)	atomic_set(&per_cpu(rcu_data, cpu).need_switch, 0)
+static inline int rcu_any_cpu_need_switch(void)
+{
+	int cpu;
+	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+		if (rcu_need_switch(cpu))
+			return 1;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static inline void rcu_set_need_switch_cpumask(cpumask_t cpumask)
+{
+	int cpu;
+	for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, cpumask)
+		atomic_set(&per_cpu(rcu_data, cpu).need_switch, 1);
+}
+#else
+#define rcu_need_switch(cpu)		cpu_isset(cpu, rcu_ctrlblk.rcu_cpu_mask)
+#define rcu_clear_need_switch(cpu)	cpu_clear(cpu, rcu_ctrlblk.rcu_cpu_mask)
+#define rcu_any_cpu_need_switch()	(!cpus_empty(rcu_ctrlblk.rcu_cpu_mask))
+#define rcu_set_need_switch_cpumask(x)	cpus_copy(rcu_ctrlblk.rcu_cpu_mask, x)
+#endif
+
 static inline int rcu_pending(int cpu) 
 {
 	if ((!list_empty(&RCU_curlist(cpu)) &&
 	     rcu_batch_before(RCU_batch(cpu), rcu_ctrlblk.curbatch)) ||
 	    (list_empty(&RCU_curlist(cpu)) &&
 			 !list_empty(&RCU_nxtlist(cpu))) ||
-	    cpu_isset(cpu, rcu_ctrlblk.rcu_cpu_mask))
+	    	rcu_need_switch(cpu))
 		return 1;
 	else
 		return 0;
Index: wli-2.6.6-rc3-mm1/kernel/rcupdate.c
===================================================================
--- wli-2.6.6-rc3-mm1.orig/kernel/rcupdate.c	2004-04-30 15:05:53.000000000 -0700
+++ wli-2.6.6-rc3-mm1/kernel/rcupdate.c	2004-05-01 13:47:05.000000000 -0700
@@ -46,10 +46,19 @@
 #include <linux/cpu.h>
 
 /* Definition for rcupdate control block. */
-struct rcu_ctrlblk rcu_ctrlblk = 
-	{ .mutex = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED, .curbatch = 1, 
-	  .maxbatch = 1, .rcu_cpu_mask = CPU_MASK_NONE };
+struct rcu_ctrlblk rcu_ctrlblk = {
+	.mutex = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED,
+	.curbatch = 1, 
+	.maxbatch = 1,
+#if !RCU_CPU_SCATTER
+	.rcu_cpu_mask = CPU_MASK_NONE
+#endif
+};
+#if RCU_CPU_SCATTER
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_data) = { .need_switch = ATOMIC_INIT(0), };
+#else
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_data) = { 0L };
+#endif
 
 /* Fake initialization required by compiler */
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct tasklet_struct, rcu_tasklet) = {NULL};
@@ -109,13 +118,14 @@
 		rcu_ctrlblk.maxbatch = newbatch;
 	}
 	if (rcu_batch_before(rcu_ctrlblk.maxbatch, rcu_ctrlblk.curbatch) ||
-	    !cpus_empty(rcu_ctrlblk.rcu_cpu_mask)) {
+	    !rcu_any_cpu_need_switch()) {
 		return;
 	}
 	/* Can't change, since spin lock held. */
 	active = idle_cpu_mask;
 	cpus_complement(active);
-	cpus_and(rcu_ctrlblk.rcu_cpu_mask, cpu_online_map, active);
+	cpus_and(active, cpu_online_map, active);
+	rcu_set_need_switch_cpumask(active);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -127,7 +137,7 @@
 {
 	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
 
-	if (!cpu_isset(cpu, rcu_ctrlblk.rcu_cpu_mask))
+	if (!rcu_need_switch(cpu))
 		return;
 
 	/* 
@@ -143,12 +153,12 @@
 		return;
 
 	spin_lock(&rcu_ctrlblk.mutex);
-	if (!cpu_isset(cpu, rcu_ctrlblk.rcu_cpu_mask))
+	if (!rcu_need_switch(cpu))
 		goto out_unlock;
 
-	cpu_clear(cpu, rcu_ctrlblk.rcu_cpu_mask);
+	rcu_clear_need_switch(cpu);
 	RCU_last_qsctr(cpu) = RCU_QSCTR_INVALID;
-	if (!cpus_empty(rcu_ctrlblk.rcu_cpu_mask))
+	if (!rcu_any_cpu_need_switch())
 		goto out_unlock;
 
 	rcu_ctrlblk.curbatch++;
@@ -186,11 +196,11 @@
 	 * it here
 	 */
 	spin_lock_irq(&rcu_ctrlblk.mutex);
-	if (cpus_empty(rcu_ctrlblk.rcu_cpu_mask))
+	if (!rcu_any_cpu_need_switch())
 		goto unlock;
 
-	cpu_clear(cpu, rcu_ctrlblk.rcu_cpu_mask);
-	if (cpus_empty(rcu_ctrlblk.rcu_cpu_mask)) {
+	rcu_clear_need_switch(cpu);
+	if (!rcu_any_cpu_need_switch()) {
 		rcu_ctrlblk.curbatch++;
 		/* We may avoid calling start batch if
 		 * we are starting the batch only
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/