Re: [PATCH 11/11] nfs-acl

[Trond Myklebust]

On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 06:28, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Client nfsacl support
> 
> Add support for the nfsacl protocol extension to nfs.
> 

Why do we have to allocate an extra socket here? Can't we always assume
that the NFSACL server will listen on port 2049 (the same as the NFS
server)?

If so, we can simply clone the NFS rpc_client in order to share the
socket/security flavours/...

BTW: why does the client side NFS_ACL select QSORT? Can't userland do
all that for us?

Cheers,
  Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/