Re: [PATCH] s390 (9/9): no timer interrupts in idle.

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Wed Apr 21 2004 - 15:49:22 EST

On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 02:13:04AM +0530, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
> I think CPU_MASK_NONE can be used only for assignments. You need
> to actually declare a generic idle_cpu_mask and set it to CPU_MASK_NONE
> for all other archs. Of course, then the compiler will not be able
> to optimize it out :)

Well, there's a const keyword in C these days, no?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at