Re: CFQ iosched praise: good perfomance and better latency

From: Daniel Pittman
Date: Mon Apr 19 2004 - 08:50:17 EST

On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Pedro Larroy wrote:
>> Hi
>> I've been trying CFQ ioscheduler in my software raid5 with nice
>> results,
>> I've observed that a latency pattern still exists, just as in the
>> anticipatory ioscheduler, but those spikes are now much lower (from
>> 6ms with AS to 2ms with CFQ as seen in the bottom of
>> plus apps seems to get a fair amount of io so they don't get starved.
>> Seems a good choice for io loaded boxes. Thanks Jens Axboe.
> Although AS isn't at its best when behind raid devices (it should
> probably be in front of them), you could be seeing some problem
> with the raid code.

Hrm. So, if AS isn't a good to have behind RAID devices, but is
reasonable before them, is there any easy way to configure a system like

I don't see an easy way to change the IO scheduler on a per-device basis


A wonderful discovery, psychoanalysis.
Makes quite simple people feel they're complex.
-- S. N. Behrman

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at