Re: [PATCH] anobjrmap 9 priority mjb tree

From: Martin J. Bligh
Date: Thu Apr 15 2004 - 01:24:49 EST


> Wherease my solution will allow multiple modifications at the same
> time (if possible) with only one pageout routine at a time. I chose
> this solution because Martin's SDET took big hit in common cases of
> adding and removing vmas from the i_mmap{_shared} data structure.

FYI, even without prio-tree, I get a 12% boost from converting i_shared_sem
into a spinlock. I'll try doing the same on top of prio-tree next.

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/