Re: [PATCH] conditionalize some boring buffer_head checks

[Matt Mackall]

On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 05:10:17AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >>I would rather not kill the code in submit_bh() outright, just disable 
> >>it for non-filesystem developers.
> >
> >
> >submit_bh() is a slowpath ;) The one in mark_buffer_dirty() will be called
> >more often, possibly others.  Kill!
> 
> Jens seems to like the debugging checks, so here's an alterna-patch.
> 
> 	Jeff
> 
> 

> ===== arch/alpha/Kconfig 1.36 vs edited =====
> +++ edited/arch/alpha/Kconfig	Wed Apr 14 04:58:08 2004
> @@ -690,6 +690,13 @@
>  	  Say Y here only if you plan to use gdb to debug the kernel.
>  	  If you don't debug the kernel, you can say N.
>  
> +config DEBUG_BUFFERS
> +	bool "Enable additional filesystem buffer_head checks"
> +	depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
> +	help
> +	  If you say Y here, additional checks are performed that aid
> +	  filesystem development.
> +
>  endmenu

Sticking this in arch/*/Kconfig seems silly (as does much of the
duplication in said files). Can we stick this and other debug bits
under the kallsyms option in init/Kconfig instead? Or alternately move
debugging bits into their own file that gets included as appropriate.

-- 
Matt Mackall : http://www.selenic.com : Linux development and consulting
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/