On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 03:42:56PM -0500, Brian King wrote:
Would you prefer a fix in call_usermodehelper itself? It could certainly
be argued that calling call_usermodehelper with wait=0 should be allowed
even when holding locks. Although, fixing it here is less obvious to me
how to do because of the arguments to call_usermodehelper. I would imagine
it would consist of creating a kernel_thread to preserve the caller's stack.
Yes, I think call_usermodehelper should be changed to create a new
kernel thread for every call. That would solve this problem, and any
future races that might happen. Care to work on that?