Re: [Patch 17/23] mask v2 = [6/7] nodemask_t_ia64_changes

[Denis Vlasenko]

On Wednesday 07 April 2004 10:44, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Several architectures have this large version of find_next_bit() code.
>
> It may well make sense for the O(1) scheduler to be inlining this.

Why?
-- 
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/