On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:23:05 -0500 Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| | Been meaning to do this for ages...
| | Another one for the janitors.
Nice, I've pulled this to my pci tree and will forward it on to Linus in
the next round of pci patches after 2.6.5 is out.
Yeah well... in the intervening time, somebody on IRC commented
"so what is so PCI-specific about those constants?"
They probably ought to be DMA_{32,64}BIT_MASK or somesuch.
Heh, ok, care to make up another patch for this? :)
Here's an updated patch, applies to 2.6.5-rc2-bk9.
I left the DMA_xxBIT_MASK defines in linux/pci.h, although
they aren't necessarily PCI-specific. Would we prefer to
have them in linux/dma-mapping.h ?