Re: [Lse-tech] [patch] sched-domain cleanups, sched-2.6.5-rc2-mm2-A3

[Ingo Molnar]

* Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Andi, could you please try the patch below - this will test whether this
> > has to do with the rate of balancing between NUMA nodes. The patch
> > itself is not correct (it way overbalances on NUMA), but it tests the
> > theory.
> 
> This works much better, but wildly varying (my tests go from 2.8xCPU
> to ~3.8x CPU for 4 CPUs. 2,3 CPU cases are ok). A bit more consistent
> results would be better though.

ok, could you try min_interval,max_interval and busy_factor all with a
value as 4, in sched.h's SD_NODE_INIT template? (again, only for testing
purposes.)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/