Re: [PATCH] nodemask_t x86_64 changes [5/7]

[William Lee Irwin III]

On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 20:11:01 -0800, Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I still don't know how I will fix the CPU_MASK_ALL static initializor in
>> the multi-word case - since I can't put runtime code in it.

On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 04:06:34PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
> #define NR_CPUS_WORDS ((NR_CPUS+BITS_PER_LONG-1)/BITS_PER_LONG)

This looks suspiciously like BITS_TO_LONGS(NR_CPUS) =)

On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 04:06:34PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
> #define NR_CPUS_UNDEF (NR_CPUS_WORDS*BITS_PER_LONG-NR_CPUS)
> #if NR_CPUS_UNDEF == 0
> #define CPU_MASK_ALL { [0 ... NR_CPUS_WORDS-1] = ~0UL }
> #else
> #define CPU_MASK_ALL { [0 ... NR_CPUS_WORDS-2] = ~0UL, ~0UL << NR_CPUS_UNDEF }
> #endif

Hmm, shouldn't that last one be ~0UL >> NR_CPUS_UNDEF?


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/