Re: [PATCH/2.4]: do_write_mem() return value check

[Marcelo Tosatti]

On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 07:59:01PM +0100, BlaisorBlade wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton, and me (I did a first fix for 2.6 and sent to him, he 
> checked everything and committed it and I changed the trivial bits for 2.4).
> 
> - remove unused `file *' arg from do_write_mem()
> 
> - Add checking for copy_from_user() failures in do_write_mem()
> 
> (Note: /dev/kmem can be written to only by root, so this *cannot* have 
> security implications)
> 
> - Return correct value from kmem writes() when a fault is encountered.  A
>   write()-style syscall's return values are:
> 
>    0 when nothing was written and there was no error (someone tried to
>    write zero bytes)
> 
>    >0: the number of bytes copied, whether or not there was an error. 
>    Userspace detects errors by noting that the write() return value is less
>    than was requested.
> 
>    <0: there was an error and no bytes were copied
> 
> TODO: Do the same changes for read_mem() and read_kmem(). The code is more 
> messy so I must create do_read_mem() to avoid clumsy counting; I will post the 
> patch first for 2.6.

Hi Paolo, 

This is nice -- although I see it as a 2.6 cleanup only.

Do you actually have any practical problem caused by the current broken 
"always return -EFAULT" ? 

Otherwise leave it for 2.6.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/