Re: Binary-only firmware covered by the GPL?

[John Hasler]

Chris writes:
> So is a reverse engineered driver where there is a binary blob the
> preferred form of source?

Where did the blob come from?  If the author wrote it in binary (unlikely),
then it's ok.  If he wrote it in hex (I've done that) he should supply a
hex file from which the blob can be generated.

> Of course reverse engineered drivers with binary blobs in them are
> probably copyright infringements anyway...

If the author ripped the blob out of someone else's closed-source binary
driver it certainly is.  It also is a GPL violation.
-- 
John Hasler               You may treat this work as if it 
john@xxxxxxxxxx           were in the public domain.
Dancing Horse Hill        I waive all rights.
Elmwood, Wisconsin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/