Re: The verdict on the future of suspending to disk?

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> Just wanting clarification; what are we thinking about the future of
> suspend implementations? Let me throw my current
> understanding/suggestion in for starters:

I'd like to know the results, too.

> - Drop PM_DISK?

I do not care which one is dropped as long as only one implementation
remains. Droping PM_DISK is indeed easiest as noone touched it for
half a year.

> - Apply patches making swsusp into suspend2, leaving out freezer changes
> until people are convinced the current solution is insufficient.

Could you prepare some "swsusp2 without freezer" patch, so that we can
see how it looks like? 

> - Pavel keeps maintaining the end result? (I'm happy to maintain it if
> he wants; I'm assuming when I say this he'll still be dealing with S3
> and Patrick will be deal with PM support proper).

I do not think Patrick is going to maintain anything.

If you want to maintain it, you can have it. Big plus if you are able
to deal with Patrick.
								Pavel
-- 
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/