Re: 2.6.4-mm1
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Sun Mar 14 2004 - 03:34:29 EST
"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I checked and tried several things, and I think CONFIG_PCI_USE_VECTOR is
> a red herring. 2.6.4-mm1 did boot with CONFIG_PCI_USE_VECTOR = Y or N as
> long as kernel preemption is disabled. It did not boot regardless of
> CONFIG_PCI_USE_VECTOR if kernel preemption is enabled. I see the
> complaints
> bad: scheduling while atomic!
> at various spots.
Please delete the spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); five lines from the
end of fs/mpage.c.
I assume Subodh did that, but all we know is that it "doesn't boot".
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/