Re: possible kernel bug in signal transit.

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Sun Mar 14 2004 - 01:38:47 EST


Alex Lyashkov <shadow@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> __ ______, 14.03.2004, __ 08:09, Andrew Morton __________:
> > Alex Lyashkov <shadow@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Well we can only return one error code. Or are you suggesting that we
> > > > should terminate the loop early on error? If so, why?
> > > You say me can return _last_ error core. but this function return
> > > _first_.
> >
> > It doesn't matter, really. Other parts of the kernel will generally return
> > the first-encountered error because at times it _does_ matter. But here it
> > doesn't.
> okey. second question.
> a really need extra variable instead change conditions in return ?

I think it's clearer that way, don't you?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/