Re: [PATCH] per-backing dev unplugging #2

[Jens Axboe]

On Fri, Mar 12 2004, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Chris Mason <mason@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > During a mixed load test including fsx-linux and a bunch of procs
> > running cp/read/rm loops, I got a null pointer deref with the call
> > trace:
> > 
> > __lock_page->sync_page->block_sync_page
> > 
> > I don't see how we can trust page->mapping in this path, can't it
> > disappear?  If so, it would be a bug without Jens' patch too, just
> > harder to hit.
> 
> yup.  I wonder why you hit it now.
> 
> diff -puN fs/buffer.c~per-backing_dev-unplugging-block_sync_page-fix fs/buffer.c
> --- 25/fs/buffer.c~per-backing_dev-unplugging-block_sync_page-fix	Fri Mar 12 11:59:37 2004
> +++ 25-akpm/fs/buffer.c	Fri Mar 12 12:00:20 2004
> @@ -2928,7 +2928,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(try_to_free_buffers);
>  
>  int block_sync_page(struct page *page)
>  {
> -	blk_run_address_space(page->mapping);
> +	struct address_space *mapping = page->mapping;
> +
> +	if (mapping)
> +		blk_run_address_space(mapping);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> 
> This should be sufficient.  All callers of lock_page() should have a ref on
> the inode so ->mapping should be stable even if truncate whips the page off
> the inode.

blk_run_address_space() already checks for mapping == NULL, so the above
cannot make any difference.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/