Re: objrmap-core-1 (rmap removal for file mappings to avoid 4:4 in <=16G machines)

[Martin J. Bligh]

> what is your point, that OASB is a worthless workload and the only thing
> that matters is TPC-C? Maybe you should discuss your point with Oracle
> not with me, since I don't know what the two benchmarks are doing
> differently. TCP-C was tested too of course, but maybe not in 32G boxes,
> frankly I thought OASB was harder than TCP-C, as I think Martin
> mentioned too two days ago.

OASB seems harder on the VM than TPC-C, yes. It seems to create thousands
of processes, and fill the user address space up completely as well (2GB
shared segments or whatever).

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/