"Amit S. Kale" <amitkale@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Let me just make sure we're taking about the same thing here. Are you
saying that with kgdb-lite, `info threads' is completely missing, or does
it just not work correctly with threads (as opposed to heavyweight
processes)?
info threads shows a list of threads. Heavy/light weight processes doesn't matter. Thread frame shown is incorrect.
It is? I haven't noticed any problems with it here. George recently
changed it to also display the process name in the gdb output, which is
valuable.
I looked at i386 dependent code again. Following code in it is incorrect. I never noticed it because this code is rarely used in full version of kgdb:
+void sleeping_thread_to_gdb_regs(unsigned long *gdb_regs, struct task_struct *p)
There is no such function in the stub in -mm kernels.
Present threads support code changes calling convention of do_IRQ. Most believe that to be an absolute no.
I see no such change in George's stub, unless I'm missing something again.
Since you consider it a must-have, I'll check whether above changes suggested by me make info threads listing correct in most cases.
The only problem I have with it is that sometimes after listing all threads
the debugger can lose control of the target and will start complaining
about communication errors. I assume the target has died. This happens
very rarely. Usually when you're about to find the bug ;)