Re: problem with cache flush routine for G5?

[Anton Blanchard]

> After doing some digging in the 970fx specs, it seems that we may not 
> need to explicitly force a store of the L1 dcache at all.  According to 
> the docs, the L1 dcache is unconditionally store-through. Thus, for a 
> brute-force implementation we should be able to just invalidate the 
> whole icache, do the appropriate sync/isync, and it should pick up the 
> changed instructions from the L2 cache.  Do you see any problems with 
> this?  Do I actually still need the store?

Yeah you will get away with it on the 970FX, do the sync before and
isync afterwards. As you suggest, you really should modify it to track 
changed regions and flush them explicitly :)

Anton
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/