Re: 230-objrmap fixes for 2.6.3-mjb2

[Dave McCracken]

--On Wednesday, March 03, 2004 07:46:32 -0800 "Martin J. Bligh"
<mbligh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> There was talk at one point of moving the "unswappable" state down into 
> the struct page. Is that still realistic? It would seem rather more
> efficient, but I forget what problem we ran into with it.

It'd mean the page struct would have to have a count of the number of
mlock()ed regions it belongs to, and we'd have to update all the pages each
time we call it.

Dave McCracken

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/