Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 03:39:26AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> A lot of this is actually optional features the other FS don't have,
> like support for separate realtime volumes and compat code for old 
> revisions, journaled quotas etc. I think you could
> relatively easily do a "mini xfs" that would be a lot smaller. 

And a whole lot of code to stay somewhat in sync with other codebases..

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/