Re: [Kgdb-bugreport] [PATCH] Kill kgdb_serial

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> > Tom Rini wrote:
> > >Hello.  The following interdiff kills kgdb_serial in favor of function
> > >names.  This only adds a weak function for kgdb_flush_io, and documents
> > >when it would need to be provided.
> > 
> > It looks like you are also dumping any notion of building a kernel that can 
> > choose which method of communication to use for kgdb at run time.  Is this 
> > so?
> 
> Yes, as this is how Andrew suggested we do it.  It becomes quite ugly if
> you try and allow for any 2 of 3 methods.

I do not think that having kgdb_serial is so ugly. Are there any other
uglyness associated with that?
								Pavel

-- 
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/