Re: Dropping CONFIG_PM_DISK?

[Michael Frank]

On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 18:32:21 +0100, Måns Rullgård <mru@xxxxxx> wrote:

> Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> writes:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > Would there be any major screaming if I tried to drop CONFIG_PM_DISK?
> > > > It seems noone is maintaining it, equivalent functionality is provided
> > > > by swsusp, and it is confusing users...
> > >
> > > It may be ugly, it may be unmaintained, but I get the impression that it
> > > works for some people for whom swsusp doesn't. So unless swsusp works for
> > > everyone or Nigel's swsusp2 is merged, I'd suggest leaving that in.
> >
> > Do you have example when pmdisk works and swsusp does not? I'm not
> > aware of any in recent history...
>
> For me, none of them (pmdisk, swsusp and swsusp2) work.  I did manage
> to get pmdisk to resume once, and swsusp2 makes it half-way through
> the resume.

Hate to hear this - 2.0 is said to work _flawlessly_ on 2.4.24 and
on 2.6.2 within the bounds of more complex PM/driver issues.

2.4.25 and 2.6.3 patches are undergoing testing.

If you like to try again, please have a look at http://swsusp.sf.net.

There is also comprehensive FAQ and Howto on the site.

You also will find a lot of user support wrt specific HW.

Myself is running 2.0 on 2.4.2[345] without any stability issues
whatsoever this year.

In short, I am confident we can make it work for you!

Regards
Michael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/