Re: kgdb support in vanilla 2.6.2

[George Anzinger]

Piet Delaney wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 13:56, George Anzinger wrote:
>
> I thought I'd poke around an AMD64 with etherbased kgdb on 2.6.*.
> I just picked up a used AMD64 K8D Master-F MS-9131 and thought I'd
> install Fedora Core 1 test1 and the latest kernel from kernel.org.
>
> It Might be interesting to try out a SuSE release also, I was wondering
> if 9.0 from linuxiso.org might be best.
>
> Last I worked with your kgdb patch for 2.6 Andrew's mm patch had the
> latest code; Is that still the case?

I think so.  I haven't look lately.  I did send out an additional patch that 
only put in dwarft2 records in some of the asm code to allow better "bt" through 
the interrupt/exception frames.  I don't know if he picked this up or not, but 
it does require using the cvs version of gdb.

-g
> -piet
>
>
> > Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 5 Feb 2004 23:20:04 +0530
> > > "Amit S. Kale" <amitkale@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Thursday 05 Feb 2004 8:41 am, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > need to take a look at such things and really convice ourselves that
> > > > > > they're worthwhile.  Personally, I'd only be interested in the basic
> > > > > > stub.
> > > > >
> > > > > What I found always extremly ugly in the i386 stub was that it uses
> > > > > magic globals to talk to the page fault handler. For the x86-64
> > > > > version I replaced that by just using __get/__put_user in the memory
> > > > > accesses, which is much cleaner. I would suggest doing that for i386
> > > > > too.
> > > >
> > > > May be I am missing something obvious. When debugging a page fault handler if 
> > > > kgdb accesses an swapped-out user page doesn't it deadlock when trying to 
> > > > hold mm semaphore?
> > >
> > >
> > > Modern i386 kernels don't grab the mm semaphore when the access is >= TASK_SIZE
> > > and the access came from kernel space (actually I see x86-64 still does, but that's 
> > > a bug, will fix). You could only see a deadlock when using user addresses
> > > and you already hold the mm semaphore for writing (normal read lock is ok). 
> > > Just don't do that. 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > George has coded cfi directives i386 too. He can use them to backtrace past 
> > > > irqs stack.
> > >
> > >
> > > Problem is that he did it without binutils support. I don't think that's a good
> > > idea because it makes the code basically unmaintainable for normal souls
> > > (it's like writing assembly code directly in hex) 
> >
> > Well, bin utils, at this time, makes it even worse in that it does not support 
> > the expression syntax.  Also, it is not asm but dwarf2 and it is written in, 
> > IMHO, useful macros (not hex :)
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > George Anzinger   george@xxxxxxxxxx
> > High-res-timers:  http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
> > Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

--
George Anzinger   george@xxxxxxxxxx
High-res-timers:  http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/