Re: Question about (or bug in?) the kobject implementation

From: Alan Stern
Date: Fri Feb 27 2004 - 15:09:03 EST


On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Greg KH wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 10:05:37AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > Is it supposed to be legal to repeatedly call kobject_add() and
> > kobject_del() for the same kobject? That is, is
> >
> > kobject_add(&kobj);
> > ...
> > kobject_del(&kobj);
> > ...
> > kobject_add(&kobj);
> > ...
> > kobject_del(&kobj);
> >
> > supposed to work?
>
> No.
>
> > The API doesn't forbid it, and there's no apparent reason why it
> > should be illegal.
>
> We prevent race conditions in kobject_put() by saying "Don't do that!"
> :)
>
> Seriously, once kobject_del() is called, you can't safely call
> kobject_get() anymore on that object.

Are you worried about the possibility of the refcount dropping to 0 and
the cleanup starting but then kobject_get() increasing the refcount again?
Or is there some other problem?

> If you can think of a way we can implement this in the code to prevent
> people from doing this, please send a patch. We've been getting by
> without such a "safeguard" so far...

Maybe I could if I knew more clearly the exact issue in question.

> > Why would anyone want to do this, you ask? Well the USB subsystem does it
> > already. Each USB device can have several configurations, only one of
> > which is active at any time. Corresponding to each configuration is a set
> > of struct devices, and they (together with their embedded kobjects) are
> > allocated and initialized when the USB device is first detected. The
> > struct devices are add()'ed and del()'ed as configurations are activated
> > and deactivated, leading to just the sort of call sequence shown above.
>
> Then we need to fix this.

As it happens, I have a patch to do that. :-) I'll send it in a separate
message.

Alan Stern

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/