Re: [RFC][PATCH] O(1) Entitlement Based Scheduler

[Rik van Riel]

On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Bill Davidsen wrote:

> I disagree.

> It would be nice to have the scheduler identify processes which
> interface to user information devices, but it must be done in a way
> which doesn't open gaping security or misuse holes.

You seem to disagree only with what you think you read,
not with what the code does.  Please read the actual
code, since it seems to do what you propose.


Rik
-- 
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/