Re: shutdown panic in mm_release (really flush_tlb_others?) (fwd)

From: Randy.Dunlap
Date: Thu Feb 26 2004 - 19:56:11 EST




| ---------- Forwarded Message ----------
| Date: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 22:13:10 -0800
| From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
| To: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
| Subject: Re: shutdown panic in mm_release (really flush_tlb_others?)
|
| >> And the award for longest panic I've ever seen goes to ....
| >> <drumroll> ....
| >>
| >> (there were several of these in sequence).
| >> Looks like it was trying to printk an error on shutdown ...
| >> really maybe " [<c0115242>] flush_tlb_others+0x22/0xd0"
| >>
| >> Probably the same panic I sent out the other day in a slight
| >> disguise ... "BUG_ON(!cpus_equal(cpumask, tmp));" in flush_tlb_others
| >
| > Cute. Didn't you have a patch for this? Or a proposed solution which
| > you've been too lazy to type in? ;)
|
| I did have a rough guess as to the problem, but not the solution:
|
| "I presume we've got a race between taking CPUs offline and the
| tlbflush code ... tlb_flush_mm reads the value from mm->cpu_vm_mask,
| and then presumably some other cpu changes cpu_online_map before it
| gets to calling flush_tlb_others ... does that sound about right?"
|
| There doesn't seem to be anything locking cpu_online_map, AFAICS,
| so presumably stop_this_cpu is futzing with it whilst we try to
| shove tlb stuff out to other people. Looks like we're trying to stop
| sending IPIs to CPUs that aren't online (which is a Good Thing (tm)),
| but we either end up calling send_IPI_mask_sequence (which already
| checks it for us), or send_IPI_mask_bitmap. I suppose we could shift
| the check into there ... it'll fix my problem for sure, but probably
| just makes the race window smaller on mach_default:
|
| diff -aurpN -X /home/fletch/.diff.exclude 2.6.1-rc2/arch/i386/kernel/smp.c 2.6.1-rc2-tlb_fix/arch/i386/kernel/smp.c
| --- 2.6.1-rc2/arch/i386/kernel/smp.c Tue Sep 2 09:55:42 2003
| +++ 2.6.1-rc2-tlb_fix/arch/i386/kernel/smp.c Tue Jan 6 22:10:44 2004
| @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ void send_IPI_self(int vector)
| */
| inline void send_IPI_mask_bitmask(cpumask_t cpumask, int vector)
| {
| - unsigned long mask = cpus_coerce(cpumask);
| + cpumask_t cpus_online;
| unsigned long cfg;
| unsigned long flags;
|
| @@ -170,11 +170,12 @@ inline void send_IPI_mask_bitmask(cpumas
| * Wait for idle.
| */
| apic_wait_icr_idle();
| -
| +
| /*
| * prepare target chip field
| */
| - cfg = __prepare_ICR2(mask);
| + cpus_and(cpus_online, cpumask, cpu_online_map);
| + cfg = __prepare_ICR2(cpus_coerce(cpus_online));
| apic_write_around(APIC_ICR2, cfg);
|
| /*
| @@ -356,7 +357,6 @@ static void flush_tlb_others(cpumask_t c
| BUG_ON(cpus_empty(cpumask));
|
| cpus_and(tmp, cpumask, cpu_online_map);
| - BUG_ON(!cpus_equal(cpumask, tmp));
| BUG_ON(cpu_isset(smp_processor_id(), cpumask));
| BUG_ON(!mm);
|
|
| (Note: not tested. I will if you want me to, but I'm not enamoured
| with the patch ;-))
|
| Perhaps there's some better solution in the up-and-coming CPU hotplug
| stuff that we could steal?


I missed this thread somehow but Martin pointed it out to me.
I'm seeing the BUG in smp.c (line #359 in 2.6.3) when using kexec
on 2.6.3. It succeeds on 2.6.2. I don't have to try to shutdown
or reboot; just run /sbin/kexec (or wherever it lives) to call
the kexec syscall.

(kexec patch is at:
http://developer.osdl.org/rddunlap/kexec/2.6.3/ )

Martin's patch didn't help me the first time that I tried it,
but I'll try it again. Rusty, is the patch that you posted
complete (regarding arch/i386/kernel/smp.c), or are there other
patch components that I might need? It's queued up for next...

Thanks,
--
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/