Re: [RFC][PATCH] O(1) Entitlement Based Scheduler

From: Peter Williams
Date: Thu Feb 26 2004 - 15:28:23 EST


Timothy Miller wrote:


Peter Williams wrote:

Timothy Miller wrote:
> <snip>

In fact, that may be the only "flaw" in your design. It sounds like your scheduler does an excellent job at fairness with very low overhead. The only problem with it is that it doesn't determine priority dynamically.



This (i.e. automatic renicing of specified programs) is a good idea but is not really a function that should be undertaken by the scheduler itself. Two possible solutions spring to mind:

1. modify the do_execve() in fs/exec.c to renice tasks when they execute specified binaries


We don't want user-space programs to have control over priority.

They already do e.g. renice is such a program.

This is DoS waiting to happen.

2. have a user space daemon poll running tasks periodically and renice them if they are running specified binaries


This is much too specific. Again, if the USER has control over this
list,

It would obviously be under root control.

then it's potential DoS. And if the user adds a program which should qualify but which is not in the list, the program will not get its deserved boost.

And a sysadmin is not going to want to update 200 lab computers just so one user can get their program to run properly.


Both of these solutions have their advantages and disadvantages, are (obviously) complicated than I've made them sound and would require a great deal of care to be taken during their implementation. However, I think that they are both doable. My personal preference would be for the in kernel solution on the grounds of efficiency.


They are doable, but they are not a general solution.


Peter
--
Dr Peter Williams, Chief Scientist peterw@xxxxxxxxxx
Aurema Pty Limited Tel:+61 2 9698 2322
PO Box 305, Strawberry Hills NSW 2012, Australia Fax:+61 2 9699 9174
79 Myrtle Street, Chippendale NSW 2008, Australia http://www.aurema.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/