Re: Intel vs AMD x86-64

[H. Peter Anvin]

Timothy Miller wrote:
> 
> 
> Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> 
>> For near branches (CALL, RET, JCC, JCXZ, JMP, etc.), the operand size is
>> forced to 64 bits on both processors in 64-bit mode, basically meaning
>> RIP is updated.
>>
>> Compilers would typically use a JMP short for "intraprocedural jumps",
>> which requires just an 8-bit displacement relative to RIP. 
> 
> I see.  It's too bad you can't have a 16-bit displacement.
> 
> Ummm... so if 66H were used with a near branch, would that affect the
> size of the immediate operand which gets added to RIP, or would that
> affect the the portion of IP/EIP/RIP affected?  If it's the latter,
> that's pretty silly.
> 

Yes, that would be pretty silly.

I honestly don't remember off the top of my head what "o16 jmp blah"
does on i386; I have a vague memory that it zero-extends %eip to 32
bits, which makes it useless, of course.

	-hpa

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/