Re: dm-crypt, new IV and standards

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

Jari,

since mainline cryptoloop/dm-crypt implementation is being changed right
now and you were complaining about it in the past, can you participate in
the discussions (there's also a parallel thread titled "[PATCH/proposal]
dm-crypt: add digest-based iv generation mode") so you don't have to
complain afterwards?

James Morris wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Jean-Luc Cooke wrote:
> 
> 
>>If others on the list care to do this, I'll give recommendation on how to 
>>implement the security (hmac, salt, iteration counts, etc).  But I think
>>this may break backward compatibility.  Can anyone speak to this?
> 
> 
> Please focus your recommendations on security, not backward compatibility
> with something that is new to the kernel tree, broken and maintainerless.


Thanks,
Carl-Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/