POSSIBLE BUG: netfilter/ip_conntrack_core

From: Peter Grace
Date: Mon Feb 16 2004 - 09:59:54 EST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello,
~ I'm posting to the list blindly this following report:

LIST_DELETE: net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_core.c:295
&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY] (c40bf384) not in &ip_conntrack_hash[hr]

I believe the memory addresses are not as pertinent as the message
itself, but the screen filled up with 4-5 of these lines before finally
biting the dust.

Can someone shoot me an e-mail in reply to let me know if this is a bug
in netfilter code or if I'm just somehow confusing the heck out of the
nat filter? I've got a set of nat forwarding rules that forwards an ip
address onto the internal lan, and then from there I'm only allowing
certain packets to go through -- that seems to have exacerbated the
problem..

Thanks in advance!

Pete

- --
- ---
/------------------------------------------------\
|Peter Grace Phone: 484-875-9462
|Technology Analyst Fax: 484-875-9461
|RealTime Technologies, Inc. Cell: 484-919-1400
|835 Springdale Drive, Suite 101
|Exton, PA 19341
\------------------------------------------------/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAMNrc1bytwQSw7hoRAlAdAKDRNDHBduc9hohuYZDiq05u3HFsLACgzFUA
Vkee3U/KD1+wrWRWBohbWCM=
=j2ZU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/