Re: [2.6.2] Badness in futex_wait revisited
From: Rusty Russell
Date: Mon Feb 16 2004 - 08:34:15 EST
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:13:35 -0800
Dirk Morris <dmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In reference to this previous post:
> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0401.1/1966.html
>
> I also get:
> Feb 13 11:43:52 timmy kernel: Call Trace:
> Feb 13 11:43:52 timmy kernel: [<c01387e1>] futex_wait+0x191/0x1a0
> Feb 13 11:43:52 timmy kernel: [<c011e9e0>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
> Feb 13 11:43:52 timmy kernel: [<c011e9e0>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
> Feb 13 11:43:52 timmy kernel: [<c0138abb>] do_futex+0x6b/0x80
> Feb 13 11:43:52 timmy kernel: [<c0138be6>] sys_futex+0x116/0x130
> Feb 13 11:43:52 timmy kernel: [<c010959f>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
>
> I get this in 2.6.1 and 2.6.2.
> In userland a call to sem_wait returns with -1, and errno = -EINTR
Yes...
Please send your config. What's happening at the time?
(Andrew's patch was buggy, I fixed it and can send you an update).
Rusty.
--
there are those who do and those who hang on and you don't see too
many doers quoting their contemporaries. -- Larry McVoy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/