Re: [PATCH] 2.6, 2.4, Nforce2, Experimental idle halt workaroundinstead of apic ack delay.

From: Prakash K. Cheemplavam
Date: Sat Feb 14 2004 - 06:17:42 EST


But it doesn't work in the sense of cooling my machine down. Though athcool reports disconnect is activated it behaves like it is not, ie, turning disconnect off makes no difference in temperatures. Your old tack patch in conjunction with 2.6.2-rc1 (linus) works like a charm, ie no lock-ups and less temp.


Thanks Prakash for testing it and spotting thermal problem.

Here are some temperatures from my machine read from the bios on reboot.
I gave it minimal activity for the minutes prior to reboot.

Win98, 47C
XPHome, 42C
Patched Linux 2.4.24 (1000Hz), 40C
Patched Linux 2.6.3-rc1-mm1, 53C OUCH!

Sorry, I will have to go through my latest patch and see why the temp differs
so much between 2.4 and 2.6. I currently use patched 2.4.24 with Suse 8.2 for
convenience. When it stopped the lockups on 2.6 I thought the 2.6 was
working the same way.



Found the problem for 2.6

After fixing it the 2.6 temperature is
Patched Linux 2.6.3-rc1-mm1, 38C
Ambient today is 1C cooler also.

Yes, I am just trying your new patch, and it works! Furthermore it seems to have less ipact on system performance than the tack one, as now hdparm reports the same figures as without using APIC. Well done!

Have you read the post from Mathieu about his finding of APIC and 8254 timer not being sync, which causes lock-ups? Maybe there should be the correct way of fixing it. Furthermore I saw this in latest ACPI update:
[ACPI] nforce2 timer lockup from Maciej W. Rozycki

Is this the fix or something else?

Cheers,

Prakash
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/