RE: what is the best 2.6.2 kernel code?

[yiding_wang]

Thanks fro all of your explanation.  It looks like I have to make sure all my software is updated for 2.6.2 build process (my original linux is 2.4.18.  I will check and try it again!

Thanks again!

Eddie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rik van Riel [mailto:riel@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 2:37 PM
> To: WANG,YIDING (A-SanJose,ex1)
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: what is the best 2.6.2 kernel code?
> 
> 
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 yiding_wang@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > I downloaded kernel linux-2.6.2.tar.gz and patch-2.6.2.bz2 
> from kernel
> > source.  Both files are dated 03-Feb.-2004.
> > 
> > Building new kernel from the source failed on fs/proc/array.o.  
> > Patching with patch file will have numerous warning message 
> which says
> > "Reversed patch detected! Assume -R [n]".
> 
> linux-2.6.1 + patch-2.6.2 results in linux-2.6.2
> 
> If you download linux-2.6.2 you don't need to apply
> any patches.
> 
> Please see http://www.kernelnewbies.org/
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Rik
> -- 
> "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
> Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
> by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan
> 
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/