Re: [PATCH][0/6] A different KGDB stub

From: Chris Wright
Date: Fri Feb 13 2004 - 14:00:45 EST


* Tom Rini (trini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 04:27:56PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > CONFIG_KGDB_SYSRQ (Just turn it on by default?)
> >
> > I have never used (or, as far as I know, needed) any of the above.
>
> I think CONFIG_KGDB_SYSRQ can die since with the 8250 and enet drivers
> you can try and connect at any point, which will schedule a breakpoint
> and you can get in like that. As for NO_KGDB_CPUS, I'm not entirely
> certain why this can't go away and there'd be an array of NR_CPUS in
> size.

Using kgdboe I've had numerous times where it gets a bit wedged and
only sysrq-g could get the breakpoint.

thanks,
-chris
--
Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/