Re: File system performance, hardware performance, ext3, 3ware RAID1, etc.
From: Daniel Blueman
Date: Fri Feb 13 2004 - 09:45:18 EST
- Next message: Lars Marowsky-Bree: "Re: dm core patches"
- Previous message: Ross Dickson: "Re: [PATCH] 2.6, 2.4, Nforce2, Experimental idle halt workaround instead of apic ack delay."
- In reply to: Jamie Lokier: "Re: File system performance, hardware performance, ext3, 3ware RAID1, etc."
- Next in thread: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "Re: File system performance, hardware performance, ext3, 3ware RAID1, etc."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
It is a small loss that the TCQ-support implementation hasn't been stable on
linux so far. I guess mostly due to the great I/O scheduling Linux has (ie
anticipatory scheduler).
Yes, a growing number of IDE disk manufacturers are using native S-ATA
controllers in their disks, and TCQ is one of the core features (ie unique selling
point), as well as being implemented on the more lavish P-ATA controllers.
It's just a shame that there are still issues saturating a bunch of IDE
disks with software RAID in the 2.6 series, but I guess that'll be ironed out in
time...
> Daniel Blueman wrote:
> > many modern IDE disks and
> > controllers also have tagged command queuing, so it is even more of a
> corner case.
>
> Linux doesn't use tagged command queueing, though - the code has been
> disabled for some time. I thought the TCQ stuff was disabled because
> only very few disks supported it and the code wasn't reliable.
>
> Yet you say many modern disks support it?
>
> -- Jamie
>
--
Daniel J Blueman
GMX ProMail (250 MB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS, Virenschutz, 2,99 EUR/Monat...)
jetzt 3 Monate GRATIS + 3x DER SPIEGEL +++ http://www.gmx.net/derspiegel +++
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Next message: Lars Marowsky-Bree: "Re: dm core patches"
- Previous message: Ross Dickson: "Re: [PATCH] 2.6, 2.4, Nforce2, Experimental idle halt workaround instead of apic ack delay."
- In reply to: Jamie Lokier: "Re: File system performance, hardware performance, ext3, 3ware RAID1, etc."
- Next in thread: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "Re: File system performance, hardware performance, ext3, 3ware RAID1, etc."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]