Re: [PATCH] 2.6, 2.4, Nforce2, Experimental idle halt workaroundinstead of apic ack delay.
From: Roberto Sanchez
Date: Thu Feb 12 2004 - 18:22:14 EST
- Next message: Timothy Miller: "File system performance, hardware performance, ext3, 3ware RAID1,etc."
- Previous message: J.A. Magallon: "Strange problem with emu10k1 and gcc-3.4"
- In reply to: Craig Bradney: "Re: [PATCH] 2.6, 2.4, Nforce2, Experimental idle halt workaroundinstead of apic ack delay."
- Next in thread: Prakash K. Cheemplavam: "Re: [PATCH] 2.6, 2.4, Nforce2, Experimental idle halt workaroundinstead of apic ack delay."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jesse Allen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 11:06:05PM +0100, Craig Bradney wrote:
so what does "My
Shuttle AN35N nforce2 board can run vanilla kernels with the 12-5-2003
dated bios version and not lock up." mean?
vanilla kernels = 2.6.0-test11 through 2.6.3-rc2 and no patches. APIC is on.
12-5-2003 BIOS:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=107124823504332&w=2
not lock up:
I could reproduce the lockup consistantly. With the 12-5-2003 bios, I cannot. Two months have passed since the original report.
Whenthis thread first(?) started way back when in Nov or Dec last year I
was pretty happy.. no lockups until the 5th day.
The different nforce boards react differently because of different hardware an
manufacterers. But they all do have a common symptom.
I don't know how to identify a fix from my bioses. If someone has any clue, I
will help out.
FWIW, my Biostar M7NCDPro with the latest (12-08-2003) BIOS locks up
consistently unless I disable APIC (either in the kernel or the BIOS)
or apply some sort of patch (like the APIC and disconnect-quirk patches
that briefly made the rounds in the -mm tree).
-Roberto Sanchez
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Next message: Timothy Miller: "File system performance, hardware performance, ext3, 3ware RAID1,etc."
- Previous message: J.A. Magallon: "Strange problem with emu10k1 and gcc-3.4"
- In reply to: Craig Bradney: "Re: [PATCH] 2.6, 2.4, Nforce2, Experimental idle halt workaroundinstead of apic ack delay."
- Next in thread: Prakash K. Cheemplavam: "Re: [PATCH] 2.6, 2.4, Nforce2, Experimental idle halt workaroundinstead of apic ack delay."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]