Re: [PATCH] 2.6, 2.4, Nforce2, Experimental idle halt workaround instead of apic ack delay.

[Jesse Allen]

On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 12:17:12PM -0600, Derek Foreman wrote:
> Some nforce2 systems work just fine.  Is there a way to distinguish
> between systems that need it and those that don't?
> 

Some nforce2 systems are fixed in certain bioses.  The problem is we don't know where/what it is in the bios.  C1 disconnect is a clue.

> (if anyone's running a betting pool, my money's on nforce2+cpu with half
> frequency multiplier ;)

I don't know what your talking about.  My Shuttle AN35N nforce2 board can run vanilla kernels with the 12-5-2003 dated bios version and not lock up.  The frequencies I run are all the default/standard ones.

Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/