Re: [Patch] Netlink BUG() on AMD64

From: Jan Kasprzak
Date: Wed Feb 11 2004 - 23:12:30 EST


David S. Miller wrote:
: Both fixes applied, thanks guys.
:
: I was tempted to make skb_put()'s second argument signed, but I'm in no mood
: to audit the entire tree for that :-)

I have grep'd the kernel for all occurences of rtattr_failure
and nlmsg_failure, and there are no more skb_put()s than those two
(hmm, legacy protocols which no-one uses, such as Decnet or IPv4 :-).
However, the same problem is in 2.4, so please push these fixes to
Marcelo as well.

-Yenya

--
| Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas at {fi.muni.cz - work | yenya.net - private}> |
| GPG: ID 1024/D3498839 Fingerprint 0D99A7FB206605D7 8B35FCDE05B18A5E |
| http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/ Czech Linux Homepage: http://www.linux.cz/ |
Any compiler or language that likes to hide things like memory allocations
behind your back just isn't a good choice for a kernel. --Linus Torvalds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/