Re: printk and long long

[Måns Rullgård]

hpa@xxxxxxxxx (H. Peter Anvin) writes:

> Followup to:  <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402111655170.17933-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> By author:    Maciej Zenczykowski <maze@xxxxxxx>
> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>>
>> On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, vda wrote:
>> 
>> > The character L specifying that a following e, E, f, g, or G
>> > conversion corresponds to a long double argument, or a following
>> > d, i, o, u, x, or X conversion corresponds to a long long argument.
>> > Note that long long is not specified in ANSI C and therefore
>> > not portable to all architectures.
>> 
>> [ personally I'd say screw the un-portable architectures ;) ]
>> Long long is here to stay.
>
> long long is C99, so it's *definitely* here to say.  The conversion specifier
> is "ll" not "L", however.

What is the proper way to deal with printing an int64_t when int64_t
can be either long or long long depending on machine?

-- 
Måns Rullgård
mru@xxxxxx

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/