Re: BUG: Why does ramfs always get built?

[Petr Tesařík]

Dne 11.02.2004 v 02:04:36 (+0100), Petr Tesarik wrote:
> but maybe this is a known issue and the ramfs is needed for something
> I can't figure out (I recompiled my kernel without ramfs and it works
> fine, so there is at least one configuration which does _NOT_ require
> it and it should then definitely be optional anyway).

Ooops, sorry. My fingers were faster than my brain. Yes, of course I
did _NOT_ recompile the kernel without ramfs, I've messed up my
sources and ramfs is really needed for init_rootfs.

Sorry for the fuss. :(

bye,
Petr T.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/